Clinicians can provide remote patient monitoring services to patients with acute and chronic conditions and for patients with only one disease.
An estimated 117 million adults have one or more chronic health conditions, and one in four adults have two or more chronic health conditions.
For example, remote patient monitoring can be used to monitor a patient’s oxygen saturation levels using pulse oximetry.
CMS is allowing physicians to supervise their clinical staff using virtual technologies when appropriate, instead of requiring in-person presence.
These services are not considered “telehealth” services and were never subject to telehealth limitations. They do have other factors that limit how they can be used so make sure you check the definition for the codes.
- 21 state Medicaid programs provide reimbursement for remote patient monitoring (RPM). As is the case for store-and-forward, two Medicaid programs (HI and NJ) have laws requiring Medicaid to reimburse for RPM but at the time the research was conducted, did not have any official Medicaid policy.
The Remote Patient Monitoring questions and answers posted here are provided for general informational purposes only and were current as of the publication date. Due to the evolving nature of the industry, updated or new guidance and clarifications from the governing agencies and your particular circumstances, your results with insurance billing/reimbursement may vary. CENSON Health in no way guarantees or warrants any particular result to be obtained from use of the information on this page. You should consult with your billing provider for the latest information, and for additional codes that have become available during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Yes. Even before the new codes, Medicare already offered separate reimbursement for RPM services billed under CPT code 99091. That service is defined as the “collection and interpretation of physiologic data (e.g., ECG, blood pressure, glucose monitoring) digitally stored and/or transmitted by the patient and/or caregiver to the physician or other qualified healthcare professional, qualified by education, training, licensure/regulation (when applicable) requiring a minimum of 30 minutes of time.”
While industry advocates generally applauded CMS for activating CPT 99091, they recognized how that code fails to optimally describe how RPM services are furnished using current technology and staffing models. These are the codes CMS finalized effective in 2019, which do a far better job in accurately reflecting contemporary RPM services.
The new Chronic Care Remote Physiologic Monitoring codes are:
CPT code 99453:
“Remote monitoring of physiologic parameter(s) (eg, weight, blood pressure, pulse oximetry, respiratory flow rate), initial; set-up and patient education on use of equipment.”
Reimbursement Rate: Approximately $21.00 (one-time)
CPT code 99454:
“16 days of Remote monitoring of physiologic parameter(s) (eg, weight, blood pressure, pulse oximetry, respiratory flow rate), initial; device(s) supply with daily recording(s) or programmed alert(s) transmission, each 30 days.”
Reimbursement Rate: $69.00 (every 30 days per patient)
CPT code 99457:
“Remote physiologic monitoring treatment management services, 20 minutes or more of clinical staff/physician/other qualified healthcare professional time in a calendar month requiring interactive communication with the patient/caregiver during the month.”
Reimbursement Rate: $54.00 (each calendar month per patient)
CPT code 99458:
“Add-on code for patients who receive an additional 20 minutes of RPM services in a given month (i.e. 40 minutes of RPM services)
Reimbursement Rate: $43.00 (each calendar month per patient)
At least 20 minutes per calendar month. This differs from CPT 99091, which requires at least 30 minutes per 30-day period. CPT 99457 is much easier to track because it is based on a calendar month, not 30-day periods. This will more easily align with record keeping and claims submission, as CPT 99457 is reimbursed on a monthly basis.
Many advocates asked CMS to clarify the kinds of technology are covered under CPT codes 99453, 99454, and 99457. Some groups gave examples of the kinds of technology they believe these codes should cover, such as software applications that could be integrated into a beneficiary’s smartphone, Holter-Monitors, Wearables, or artificial intelligence messaging. Other examples included behavioral health data and data from wellness applications, or results of patients’ self-care tasks. Unfortunately, CMS did not offer any specifics in the final rule on what technology qualifies, but CMS does plan to issue forthcoming guidance to help inform practitioners and stakeholders on these issues.
CPT 99457 allows RPM services to be performed by the physician, qualified healthcare professional, or clinical staff. Clinical staff includes, for example, RNs and medical assistants (subject to state law scope of practice and state law supervision requirements). The inclusion of “clinical staff” is the most significant differentiator from CPT 99091, as that code is limited only to “physicians and qualified health care professionals.” All practitioners must practice in accordance with applicable state law and scope of practice laws. The term “other qualified healthcare professionals” used in CPT 99457 is a defined term, and that definition can be found in the CPT Codebook.
Yes. CPT code 99457 may be furnished by auxiliary personnel, “incident to” the billing practitioner’s professional services. An “incident to” service is one that is performed under the supervision of a physician (broadly defined), and billed to Medicare in the name of the physician, subject to certain requirements. As of January 1, 2020 Medicare has shifted from direct supervision to general supervision. Therefore, CPT codes 99457 and 99458 falls under general supervision — i.e. the physician and auxiliary personnel are NOT required to be in the same building at the same time.
Yes. CPT 99453 offers separate reimbursement for the initial work associated with on-boarding a new patient, setting up the equipment, and patient education on use of the equipment.
Yes, patients can receive RPM services in their homes.
RPM services do not require the use of interactive audio-video, as these codes are inherently non face-to-face. A face to face visit is not required.
Yes, the practitioner must get the patient’s consent for RPM services and document it in the patient’s medical record.
One patient could be enrolled in two different providers RPM programs, however, the same time and activities could not be double counted by both providers for purposes of billing any of the four codes.
It is important to note that neither RPM nor CCM are Telehealth services as defined by Medicare and therefore not subject to the restrictive requirements applicable to the location of the patient, type of provider, and type of technology. RPM 99457 may be reported during the same service period as CCM services, TCM services and BHI services. However, time spent providing any of these services should remain separate and no time should be counted toward the required time for more than one type of service.
Yes, a provider can bill both CPT 99457 and CPT 99490 in the same month. This is allowed because CMS recognizes the kind of analysis involved in furnishing RPM services is complementary to CCM and other care management services. However, time spent furnishing these services cannot be counted towards the required time for both RPM and CCM codes for a single month (i.e., no double counting). Accordingly, billing both requires at least 40 minutes total (20 minutes of CCM and 20 minutes of RPM).
CPT code 99454 covers the provision and monitoring during at least 16 days of 30 days. In other words, the device must transmit data for a minimum of 16 days within a 30-day period.
While CMS has not provided specific guidance on counting minutes for RPM, CMS has provided the following rules
with respect to counting 20 minutes for CCM; we assume CMS would apply the same rules to RPM CPTs 99457
1. Time spent providing services on different days, or by different clinical staff members in the same calendar
month, may be aggregated to total 20 minutes.
2. If two staff members are furnishing services at the same time (e.g., discussing together the beneficiary’s
condition), only the time spent by one individual may be counted.
3. Time of less than 20 minutes during a calendar month cannot be rounded up to meet this requirement (e.g., if
only 18 minutes, no billable service; if only 38 minutes, bill CPT 99457, but not 99458).
4. Time in excess of 20 minutes (but less than the 20 minutes necessary to bill CPT 99458) in one month cannot be
carried forward to the next month.
5. For CCM, one may count time a practitioner or clinical staff member spends with more than one beneficiary
(e.g., educating two beneficiaries at the same time) toward the total minutes for all participating beneficiaries;
presumably, the same would be true for treatment management services.
CMS has not provided guidance regarding the way time spent providing treatment management services should be documented. For RPM, we recommend capturing the date and time spent providing the non-face- to-face services (including start and stop times), the name of the care team member providing services (with credentials), and a brief description of the services provided.
Although CMS has not addressed the issue, we believe, based on CMS’ guidance regarding CCM, that the date of service on the claim would be the date on which the 20th minute of work occurs or any date thereafter in the calendar month for CPT 99457. CPT 99458 should be billed using the date on which each subsequent 20 minutes of work occurs or any date thereafter in the calendar month. The place of service would be the location at which the billing physician maintains his or her practice (i.e., physician office vs. hospital outpatient department).
As with CPT 99091, while a provider is not required to submit a claim for CPT 99453 and 99454 to bill for CPT
99457, it appears CMS requires such treatment management services to be based on a minimum of 16 days of data. Also, CMS has not specifically addressed whether such data must be collected and transmitted by a device that meets the requirements specified for CPT 99453 and 99454.
Again, note that a practitioner who bills for CPT 99457 without having billed for CPT 99453 and 99454 still would be subject to the established patient and consent requirements previously discussed.
And, again, note that for the duration of the COVID-19 PHE, only 2 days of monitoring is required for patients with suspected or confirmed cases of COVID-19 to bill CPT 99457.
Do not count any time on a day when the billing physician or practitioner reports an E/M service (office or other outpatient services (CPT 99201, 99202, 99203-99205, and 99211-99215); domiciliary, rest home services (CPT 99324-99328 and 99334-99337); or home services (CPT 99341-99345 and 99347-99350). Do not count any time related to other reported services (e.g., CPT 93290).
The codes can be reported during the same service period as chronic care management services (CPT 99439,
99487, 99489, 99490, and 99491), transitional care management services (CPT 99495 and 99496), and behavioral health integration services (CPT 99484, 99492, 99493, and 99494 ). However, time spent performing these services should remain separate and no time should be counted toward the required time for both services in a
The supervising practitioner does not have to be the same individual treating the patient more broadly. However, CPT 99457 and CPT 99458 must be billed under the National Provider Identifier (NPI) of the practitioner who supervises the clinical staff performing the service.
CPT 99457 and 99458 qualify as designated care management services under 42 CFR 410.26(b)(5), meaning these services can be furnished under the general supervision (as opposed to direct supervision) of a physician or practitioner.
CMS has not stated any requirements, nor offered any guidance, regarding the documentation necessary to
support a claim under CPT 99453 or 99454, or the appropriate date or place of service to be listed on the claim form. Absent such direction, we recommend the following:
• The documentation for CPT 99453 would include: (a) a practitioner order for deployment of the device; (b) the condition for which the beneficiary is being monitored and the medical necessity of the monitoring device;(c) the beneficiary’s consent for RPM services; (d) identification of the device; (e) date of delivery of the device to the patient/caregiver; and (f) date(s) on which training is provided to patient/caregiver.
• The documentation for CPT 99454 would be sufficient to demonstrate monitoring occurred for at least 16 days in a 30-day period.
• The date of service for CPT 99453 would be the date on which the device records the 16th day of data in a 30-day period following initiation of the service (or the last date of that 30-day period).
• If the device records and transmits data for at least 16 days, but not more than 30 days, the date of service for CPT 99454 would be the last day the device records data and transmits it to the provider.
• If the device records and transmits data for more than 30 days, the date of service for the first instance of CPT 99454 for a given beneficiary would be 30 days following the delivery of the device or completion of training (whichever occurred later). The date of service for each instance thereafter would be 30 days from the prior date of billing, provided the use of the device continued at least 16 days after the prior date of service.
• Based on CMS’ guidance regarding CCM, the place of service for both codes would be the location at which the billing practitioner maintains his or her practice (i.e., physician office vs. hospital outpatient department).